On 08/26/2014 06:58 PM, Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > If it's a corner case, it won't be hit often enough right? And if it > was hit often enough, it wouldn't be corner case!? :) > > These 2 are mutually exclusive! > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> After reading through the code in inode.c today , I am curious about the comment and the following code I will paste >> below. I am curious if this corner case is hit often enough for me to write a patch to improve the speed of this >> corner case. Furthermore , compress_file_range is the function name, in case you can't guess by the pasted code. >> Regards Nick >> 411 /* >> 412 * we don't want to send crud past the end of i_size through >> 413 * compression, that's just a waste of CPU time. So, if the >> 414 * end of the file is before the start of our current >> 415 * requested range of bytes, we bail out to the uncompressed >> 416 * cleanup code that can deal with all of this. >> 417 * >> 418 * It isn't really the fastest way to fix things, but this is a >> 419 * very uncommon corner. >> 420 */ >> 421 if (actual_end <= start) >> 422 goto cleanup_and_bail_uncompressed; >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies I get that my question is if this corner case is hit, enough for me to write a patch to optimize it. In addition the comment states it isn't but want to known for standard compression workloads in btrfs if it's hit enough for me to work on this and how much speed degradation are me we doing my not writing it better. Nick _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
