I agree with Valdis. This is how it works. On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:52 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 23:49:48 +0530, Saket Sinha said: >> Each filesystem has its own use-case. Like XFS is for big data, btrfs >> with its COW and other features meets some specific use-cases like >> facebook where they have a scenario(refer >> http://lwn.net/Articles/591780/ ) where btrfs suites then perfectly. > > Right. The point I was making is that although btrfs has some *really* > nice use-cases, they are by and large places where IBM is *not* going > to engage one of their storage engineers. A "use btrfs" recommendation > is going to come from a different engineering group, and a "here's > how to tune btrfs" is probably going to come from somebody in their > Professional Services (at $200/hour and up). _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
