Ok, I will ask for a embedded powerpc board to test this.
Thanks
--
Lucas Tanure +55 (19) 988176559
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:43 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:19:37 +0200, Kristof Provost said:On the other hand, it would probably be a *really* good idea to test compile
> On 2014-07-24 09:00:22 (-0300), Lucas Tanure <tanure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Line 2 of arch/arch/powerpc/boot/io.h :
> >
> > 1 #ifndef _IO_H
> > 2 #define __IO_H
> > 3
> > 4 #include "types.h"
> >
> > Should be _IO_H, not __IO_H. I'm right ?
> >
> That certainly looks wrong. It's also been wrong since October 2006, so
> it's probably not actually causing problems.
it on a powerpc box, see if it shakes out any latent bugs. All that fixing
this will do is stop us from over-including io.h (and thus types.h) - but if
there's any code that breaks because we don't include types.h and they don't
pick it up otherwise.....
(In other words, it's probably not causing a problem, but it *could* potentially
be papering over a problem elsewhere...)
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
