Re: Block device driver question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pranay,
  Basically user can do io directly on device without involving the filesystem.

Regards,
Neha

On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Pranay Srivastava <pranjas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 03-Nov-2013 9:10 AM, "neha naik" <nehanaik27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pranay,
>> Your answers assume that there is always a filesystem above the block
>> device driver which is not necessarily condition.
> Yes.
> But isn't your case the same one? You are doing i/o directly on device
> right? Does your case differ?
>
>     ---P.K.S
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Neha
>>
>> On Nov 2, 2013 8:58 AM, "Pranay Srivastava" <pranjas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01-Nov-2013 10:57 PM, "neha naik" <nehanaik27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >   I am writing a block device driver and i am using the
>>> > 'blq_queue_make_request' call while registering my block device
>>> > driver.
>>> >   Now as far as i understand this will bypass the linux kernel queue
>>> > for each block device driver (bypassing the elevator algorithm etc).
>>> > However, i am still not very clear about exactly how i get a request.
>>> >
>>> >  1.  Consider i am doing a dd on the block device directly :
>>> >   Will it bypass the buffer cache(/page cache) or will it use it.
>>>
>>> Page cache use is for file system. Block driver has got nothing to do
>>> with it. So lets keep these separate.
>>>
>>> Bios don't care which page you give them all it needs is a page in bvec.
>>> The file system would wait on that page to be uptodate which might be done
>>> in bio_end_io if i/o was good.
>>>
>>> In case of buffer heads the same thing. Submit_bh would create a bio for
>>> that bh so really same stuff.
>>>
>>> > Example if i register my block device with set_blocksize() as 512. And
>>> > i do a dd of 512 bytes will i get a read because it passes through the
>>> > buffer cache and since the minimum page size is 4096 it has to read
>>> > the page first and then pass it to me.
>>>
>>> If you are writing why it would read the page? Reads would initiate write
>>> outs i think. Take a look at generic_file_aio_write.
>>>
>>> >     I am still unclear about the 'page' in the bvec. What does that
>>> > refer to? Is it a page from the page cache or a user buffer (DMA).
>>>
>>> Whatever filesystem gave it. If it uses the generic functions that should
>>> come from page cache but again it depends on how filesystem created bio.
>>>
>>> So for block driver you need to know if the page you are given in bvec is
>>> something you can use or you need to check and take measures to successfully
>>> do i/o.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2. Another thing i am not clear about is a queue. When i register my
>>> > driver, the 'make_request' function gets called whenever there is an
>>> > io. Now in my device driver, i have some more logic about  writing
>>> > this io i.e some time may be spent in the device driver for each io.
>>> > In such a case, if i get two ios on the same block one after the other
>>> > (say one is writing 'a' and the other is writing 'b') then isn't it
>>> > possible that i may end up passing 'b' followed by 'a' to the layer
>>> > below me (changing the order because thread 'a' took more time than
>>> > thread 'b').
>>> Then in that case should i be using a queue in my layer -
>>> > put the ios in the queue whenever i get a call to 'make_request'.
>>> > Another thread keeps pulling the ios from the queue and processing
>>> > them and passing it to the layer below.
>>> >
>>> You mean layer above right? that is the filesystem correct? But if thats
>>> the case then wouldn't your second request be blocked until the page was
>>> unlocked by file system which would happen i think after your driver was
>>> done with i/o. Thats because you won't mark the request as complete so i
>>> guess threads would wait_on_page to be unlocked.
>>>
>>> If however your driver "lies" about completing requests then yeah you
>>> need to take appropriate measure.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Neha
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Kernelnewbies mailing list
>>> > Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>>>
>>>         --P.K.S

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux