Re: kernel panic in sample block device driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/13, Kumar amit mehta <gmate.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to block layer in linux and to learn the same, I'm trying to
> come up with a sample memory based block device driver, with which I can
> experiment and learn along the way. I'm referring to sample code from
> the linux tree [1] and assorted information available over the internet.
> My current module is causing system crash as soon I load it. Please take a
> look.
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> /*
>  * 1: register the major number
>  * 2: register callback functions for various capabilities
>  * 3: register a request function
>  * 4: disks characteristics information; gendisk
>  */
>
> #define RAMDK_MAJOR	166 //unique but static on my current machine as of
> now	
> #define BLKDEV_NAME	"ramdk"
> #define RAMDK_MINOR_NR	1
>
> #define DISKSIZE 256*1024
> #define NSECTORS 512
> char buffer[DISKSIZE];
>
> static struct gendisk *rdk = NULL;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ramdk_sp_lock);
> static struct request_queue *ramdk_queue = NULL;
>
> int ramdk_open(struct block_device *, fmode_t);
> int ramdk_release(struct gendisk *, fmode_t);
>
> int ramdk_open(struct block_device *blk, fmode_t mode)
> {
> 	printk(KERN_INFO "place holder for ramdisk's open method");
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> int ramdk_release(struct gendisk *gdk, fmode_t mode)
> {
> 	printk(KERN_INFO "place holder for ramdisk's release method");
> 	return 0;
> }
> 	
> static const struct block_device_operations ramdk_op = {
> 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> 	.open = ramdk_open,
> 	.release = ramdk_release,
> };
>
> /*
>  * block devices do not provide read()/write() routines like the char
>  * devices, instead they use request callback.
>  */
> static void rdk_request(struct request_queue *q)
> {
> 	struct request *rq;
>
> 	/*
>  	 * look at a request and then dequeue it
>  	 */
> 	rq = blk_fetch_request(q);
> 	while (rq) {
> 		unsigned long offset = blk_rq_pos(rq);
> 		unsigned long nbytes  = blk_rq_cur_bytes(rq);
> 		int err = 0;
> 		while (nbytes) {
> 			if (rq_data_dir(rq) == READ) {
> 				memcpy(rq->buffer, (char *)offset, nbytes);
> 			} else if (rq_data_dir(rq) == WRITE) {
> 				memcpy((char *)offset, rq->buffer, nbytes);
> 			} else {
> 				printk(KERN_ERR "unknown operation\n");
> 			}
> 			nbytes -= offset;
> 		}
> 		if (!__blk_end_request_cur(rq, err))
> 			rq = blk_fetch_request(q);
> 	}
> 	return;
> }
>
> static int __init ramdk_init(void)
> {
> 	int ret = -1;
> 	/*
>  	 * blocking call. On success, assign an unused major number and add a
> entry in
>  	 * /proc/devices.
>  	 */
> 	if (register_blkdev(RAMDK_MAJOR, BLKDEV_NAME))
> 		return -EBUSY;
>
>         printk(KERN_INFO "registered block device %s with major: %d",
> 		BLKDEV_NAME, RAMDK_MAJOR);
>
> 	rdk = alloc_disk(RAMDK_MINOR_NR);
> 	if (!rdk) {
> 		ret = -ENOMEM;
> 		goto disk_alloc_fail;
> 	}
>
> 	rdk->fops = &ramdk_op;
> 	/*
>  	 * HW perform I/O in the multiples of sectors(512Bytes, typically),
> whereas SW(FS, etc)
>  	 * will work on block size(4k, typically). Therefore we need to tell the
> upper layers
>  	 * about the capability of the hardware. This also sets the maximum number
> of sectors
>  	 * that my hardware can receive per request.
>  	 */
> 	set_capacity(rdk, DISKSIZE*2); //Capacity, in terms of sectors
> 	/*
>          * returns request queue for the block device. protected using spin
> lock
>          */
> 	ramdk_queue = blk_init_queue(rdk_request, &ramdk_sp_lock);
> 	if (!ramdk_queue)
> 		goto queue_fail;
>
> 	rdk->queue = ramdk_queue;
> 	rdk->major = RAMDK_MAJOR;
> 	rdk->first_minor = 0;
> 	sprintf(rdk->disk_name, BLKDEV_NAME);
> 	rdk->private_data = buffer;
> 	/*
>  	 * Going live now!!!
>  	 */	
> 	add_disk(rdk);
> 	
> 	return 0;
>
> queue_fail:
> 	printk(KERN_ERR "failed to allocate queue for %s",BLKDEV_NAME);
>
> disk_alloc_fail:
> 	unregister_blkdev(RAMDK_MAJOR, BLKDEV_NAME);
> 	
> 	return ret;
> }
>
> static void __exit ramdk_exit(void)
> {
>         del_gendisk(rdk);
> 	put_disk(rdk);
>    	blk_cleanup_queue(ramdk_queue);
> 	unregister_blkdev(RAMDK_MAJOR, BLKDEV_NAME);
> 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s is offline now!!!",BLKDEV_NAME);
> }
>
> module_init(ramdk_init);
> module_exit(ramdk_exit);
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("goon");
>
> Once this issue is fixed, I plan to add support for filesystem related
> operations such as mkfs, mount, etc.
>
> [1] drivers/block/z2ram.c
>
> -Amit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>

Hey Amit,

I'm not sure about what's wrong with it, but why not try to process
each segment separately. i know it's more work but you should plan for
that too.
In the mean time you can look at

https://github.com/pranjas/block_driver

I wrote this sometime back and its commented heavily. its also for in
memory disk but you can set the block device sector size other than
512 bytes.

You might get a freeze kernel or crash when u unload it lemme know if
that happens, or change the blk_end_request call to
blk_end_request_all.

Hope it helps
                   -P.K.S


-- 
Pranay Srivastava

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux