Re: oops in a kernel module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:34:00 +0300, Kevin Wilson said:
> Hello,

> static int __init init_zeromib(void)

This is your init routine...

> {
> int ret = 0;
> printk("in %s\n",__func__);

Missing KERN_DEBUG or similar here.  This can cause it to fail
to appear in dmesg output, causing much confusion.


> #define SNMP_ZERO_STATS(mib, field) this_cpu_add(mib[0]->mibs[field],-(mib[0]->mibs[field]))

You *do* realize that this doesn't in fact zero the statistics, right?

If you have a 32-core machine, this will zero 1/32 of the statistics.

this_cpu_add and friends are there specifically so that on multi-core systems
there's a lockless way to update the statistics values - to actually find
the values, you need to walk across all the per_cpu areas and sum them
up.

And why for the love of all that is good did you do this bletcherous thing
with this_cpu_add() instead of using 'this_cpu_write(whatever, 0)'? Or at
least use this_cpu_sub()? ;)

Attachment: pgp62Fz20yPXv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux