On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fre, 2012-12-21 at 09:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> At 2012-12-20 18:01:40,"Bernd Petrovitsch" <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >On Don, 2012-12-20 at 11:11 +0800, horse_rivers wrote:
> >[....]
> >> becasue i want to compile linux 2.6 version kernel ,which require gcc2.95.3
> >
> >2.6 as such covers the range of years - look at the release dates from
> >2.6.0 and 2.6.39.
> >
> >And requirements are usually the minimum (here: oldest) version.
> >All remotely currently deployed gcc's (including from - but not limited
> >to - Debian/stable over RedHat-Enterprise-6 to SUSE/Novell with and
> >without updates) up to gcc-4.7.2 (most recent stable) should actually
> >work.
>Short answer: Probably - it is worth a try.
> that is saying the gcc4.7 can compile linux kernel 2.6.0-2.6.39 ?
Long answer: First, I would try the gcc from your distribution - it it
works, be done with it.
Than I would try a somewhat recent one - either a prepackaged one (beu I
do not know if such actually exist somewhere) or a self-`make
bootstrap`ped one (which is IMHO easy enough).
Recent ones should understand/compile also 10 years old source ....
Why not use a buildroot based tool chains or get an old toolchain and use it as cross compiler. That should work for the most part.
Though it uses uclibc, you can replace it with normal libc.
Though it uses uclibc, you can replace it with normal libc.
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LUGA : http://www.luga.at
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
--
Thank you
Warm Regards
Anuz
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
