Re: FUSE licence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I guess this means commercial applications can link against libfuse
because the LGPL allows that, which the kernel modules are in GPL in
order to be compliant with the rest of the kernel.
Userspace apps won't need to link against the module anyway.

Best Regards,
Mohammed

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:07 PM, SaNtosh kuLkarni
<santosh.yesoptus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi i see the following license for FUSE
>
> GPL for kernel part, LGPL for Libfuse
>
> What does this mean can anyone brief me. Can FUSE be used for developing
> commercial application using that.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux