Re: when to return -EOPNOTSUPP in _ioctl in a driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> do we actually need to specify a pointer to the ioctl callback, if the
>> driver doesn't support ioctl?
>
> What type of driver? For networking if you do not have
> ops->ndo_do_ioctl then -EOPNOTSUPP is returned. See dev_ifsioc() and
> prior to that dev_ioctl() on net/core/dev.c.
>
>   Luis


Hi Luis,

Thanks for the reply,

actually i see it in drivers/staging/csr/

this is in netdev.c

here they do the below way

csr_xxx_ioctl(....)
{
          int ret;

          ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;

          return ret;
}

if the ioctl just needs to say that i am not going to support ioctl,
then why we give the function address in the netdev_ops?

as i understood from your reply that the dev_ioctl returns -EOPNOTSUPP
when theres' no ioctl pointer registered in netdev_ops

am i right?


sorry for late reply,

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux