When I spoke about .init section of the final kernel image, please note that this section is going to
contain all the __init data (and functions) coming from _All_ the drivers and modules that were included
as part of the kernel image. Hence, after initialization when we look at the print:
" [1.011596] Freeing unused kernel memory: 664k freed "
we see 664k bytes being freed.
This is a significant amount of contiguous physical memory that we can see being released by the kernel.
The same cannot be held true for a single loadable module which may be releasing just a few, virtually
contiguous memory.
Regards,
-Amar
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Amarnath Revanna <amarnath.revanna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ezequiel,On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Amar,
Modules are loaded with vmalloc, right?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Amarnath Revanna
<amarnath.revanna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On the other hand, any other kernel module that you load using insmod or
> modprobe comes after this stage, wherein the kernel was already booted, and
> hence, no memory area of __init will ever be freed.
>
Could you explain why the kernel can't free those __init symbols
from memory also in this case?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.When we look at the definition of __init & __initdata in http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/init.h#L44,44 #define __init __section(.init.text) __cold notrace 45 #define __initdata __section(.init.data) 46 #define __initconst __section(.init.rodata) 47 #define __exitdata __section(.exit.data) 48 #define __exit_call __used __section(.exitcall.exit)we can notice that the functions represented by __init and any data represented by __initdata are going to be placedin a separate section of the final kernel binary image (zImage/uImage/vmlinux) by the linker.This section is going to be called the .init section.The idea behind forming this separate .init section in the final kernel image is to hold all those functions and data structuresthat are going to be required only once during initialization, together.By doing so, the kernel, once it boots up, would have already utilized all these resources once during bootup sequence andhence, can now be released from the memory. As a result, the kernel would simply discard this entire ".init" section from theRAM in one go, there by freeing the memory. The amount of memory being freed by removing this section is thus printed inthe line:" [1.011596] Freeing unused kernel memory: 664k freed "
Now, when we think about loadable modules, as you rightly said, are loaded into the kernel memory by obtaining the memoryarea from the heap using vmalloc. The interesting thing about this is that, since we are going to load only one modulewithin this vmalloc'd area, we can normally expect the size of __initdata and __init function to be pretty small, in few bytes.Now, it becomes too difficult for the kernel to manage (keep track of and free) these smaller memory areas coming up fromevery individual loaded module.Another thing to add is that, in case of freeing up an entire .init section from the RAM, we are recovering the entire .initsection size'd _contiguous_ physical memory area back to the kernel. However, in case of Loaded Kernel Module (LKM) if wetry to free up the __init memory of an LKM that was allocated using vmalloc, we may only be freeing up few bytes of memorythat was virtually contiguous. This may not be of much significance for the kernel operation as compared to its overheadinvolved with managing a process to keep track of and freeing up all these __init memory in vmalloc area.In short, its kind of a nice trade off done to leave this __init data cleanup for LKM while keeping its significance for all built indrivers/modules.
Regards,-Amar
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies