On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> rpjday wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > $ stap -e 'probe kernel.function("sys_open") {log("hello world") exit()}'
> > and got:
> > ===== start =====
> > [...]
> > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > make[1]: *** [/tmp/stapadEYdA/stap_59bddd394f89d5f186da7e250db36434_876.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [_module_/tmp/stapadEYdA] Error 2
> > Pass 4: compilation failed. Try again with another '--vp 0001' option.
>
> Please try systemtap 1.7, or build one out of
> <git://sourceware.org/git/systemtap.git>. Newer kernels sometimes
> break systemtap assumptions; these are fixed pretty quickly in the
> source tree, and get rolled into later releases.
>
> Please report any further problems at <systemtap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> including /usr/bin/stap-report output, if able.
ok, but i'm curious ... i took a quick look at earlier kernels and i
don't see where "struct hlist_head" *ever* had a "next" member field
that is required by this version of systemtap (1.4).
can you clarify which kernel version(s) would have worked with this
version of systemtap? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
