On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Vijay Chauhan <kernel.vijay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm checking the container_of and offsetof macro
#define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({ \
const typeof( ((type *)0)->member ) *__mptr = (ptr);
(type *)( (char *)__mptr - offsetof(type,member) );})
#define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) \
((size_t) &((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER)
I did not understand the first line of both macro. Will it not create
the NULL pointer dereference problem? I know it works and read some
article but it did not explain this part, so can anyone explain why
the NULL pointer error is not coming. Am I missing something?
Any C language specification of such example.
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
/manohar
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
