On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:07 AM, K K <knewsgroup@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry about that I miss the previous sentence, the whole paragraph is:
Under no circumstance shall the operation fail with a timeout if a message can be removed from
the message queue immediately. The validity of the abstime parameter need not be checked if a
message can be removed from the message queue immediately.
It seems that the first sentence is more affirmative that the timeout should not be checked when a message can be removed from message queue immediately.
How do you think?
Thanks,
Kai
Hi Bernd,On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 10:30 +0800, K K wrote:
[....]
> I am doing POSIX test on linux. And for mq_timedreceive() in POSIX spec
> 2008 Issue 7, Line 43787:
>
> The validity of the abstime parameter need not be checked if a
> message can be removed from the message queue immediately.
>
Sorry about that I miss the previous sentence, the whole paragraph is:
Under no circumstance shall the operation fail with a timeout if a message can be removed from
the message queue immediately. The validity of the abstime parameter need not be checked if a
message can be removed from the message queue immediately.
It seems that the first sentence is more affirmative that the timeout should not be checked when a message can be removed from message queue immediately.
How do you think?
Thanks,
Kai
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
