blktrace vs ftrace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I'm trying to analize I/O behavior of Qemu on the host.

I used blktrace and the blk tracer for ftrace but I see different I/O 
behavior.
I use 4 threads in the VM each reading sequentially a file. Readahead is 
turned off. With blktrace reads are transmitted in a sequential way, 
which means the next read will be executed when the first one has 
completed. In comparison with ftrace, up to 4 reads are issued to the 
disk in parallel.

I suppose the different behaviors are due to the overhead introduced by 
the tracers.
My doubt is, which tracer has less influence on the I/O behaviour and 
therefore reflects the system behaviour without tracing.

Thanks a lot,
Matthias

---
http://motzblog.wordpress.com/

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux