On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:58:30PM +0530, Sukrit Sangwan wrote: > also i want to ask why not use simply 8 instead of sizeof(u8). That would be 1 most of the time. sizeof returns the size in bytes (according to the C reference manual in K&R's book). Apart from that, sizeof(u8) is more explicit about the intention. HTH, Jonathan Neuschäfer _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
