On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Dave Hylands <dhylands@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Chetan,
Back in 2.6.36, the ioctl member of the struct file_operations
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Chetan Nanda <chetannanda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facing a strange issue with the ioctl commands, and not able to find
> what wrong I am doing.
> I am trying with a dummy kernel driver and implemented ioctl command as
> follow:
>
> in my_ioctl.h
> #define READHWREG_MAGIC_NUMBER 0x15
> #define READHWREG_CAM_READPE _IOR(READHWREG_MAGIC_NUMBER, 1, int*)
>
> But the value of 'READHWREG_CAM_READPE' is comes out to be different in
> userspace (in the application) and kernel space (in the driver).
>
> In userspace I used ioctl as
> ...
> printf("\ncommand %x \n",READHWREG_CAM_READPE); <-- command 80041501
> error = ioctl(g_DevFileId, READHWREG_CAM_READPE);
> ..
>
> In kernel space
>
> int readHwReg_ioctl(struct inode *node, struct file *filp, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> ...
> printk("\n%d %s cmd = %x\n",__LINE__,__FUNCTION__,cmd); <--- cmd =
> bee6a9d4
structure (which took 4 arguments) was finally deprecated, replaced
with unlocked_ioctl (which only takes 3 arguments).
If you just renamed and ignored the compiler warnings, then that
explains your problem.
Thanks Dave for pointing out 'unlocked_ioctl'
I come across this link:
http://lwn.net/Articles/119652/
I come across this link:
http://lwn.net/Articles/119652/
--
Dave Hylands
Shuswap, BC, Canada
http://www.davehylands.com
Thanks,
Chetan Nanda
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
