Re: Why do the CFS chase fairness?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/9/21 Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Permenides :)
>
> Looks like I made few typos here and there, so allow me to put few erratas :)
>
>> 2011/9/20 Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> What the scheduler needs perhaps at this point is good priority
>>> recalculation is C could run ASAP. If not, even though C is in run
>
> "recalculation so C could be executed ASAP. ......."
>
>>> queue, it still can beat the other processes in the competition of CPU
>
> "...it could be beaten by other processes.."
>

Yes, even with enough timeslice, if C does not have high enough
priority, it can not preempt A or B. That's the point where priority
play its role when the scheduler prefer to IO-bound tasks. Thank you
again.

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux