Re: the cost of vmalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On 21:16 Fri 09 Sep     , Zheng Da wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I need to allocate fairly a large piece of memory, about 128KB or
> 256KB. I tried to use kmalloc, and it sometimes fails, but vmalloc in
> this case usually still work.
> But I'm not sure how costly vmalloc is. As far as I know, vmalloc
> needs to change the page table, and thus might need to invalidate TLB.
> It seems quite expensive. If it is, maybe I can allocate memory with
> kmalloc first, and then try to use vmalloc if kmalloc fails. Any
> suggestions?

If it is at all possible, I would suggest avoiding to allocate more than
PAGE_SIZE (usually 4KB) in one continuous chunk. You can use e.g.
scatterlists (which are basically lists of pointers) if you need a bigger
buffer.

	-Michi
-- 
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com


_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux