Hi.... On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:10, Adam Lee <adam8157@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, all > > I'm working on a test which invoking setitimer(), and it hang in > ia32 and ppc, but passed in amd64, could you guys give some help? > > 1, I know the 'value.it_interval.tv_usec' is too short, but why amd64 > passed? All of my answers are pure speculation. Regarding AMD64 that successfully run the code, I am not sure it's due to the processor itself. Maybe because...in your machine that use AMD64, it uses HPET by default? > 2, If I switch clock source from "tsc" to "hpet" on ia32, it passed. This is interesting. I can only offer one explanation: finer grained timer resolution. TSC itself should be fast, but I am not whether it triggers interrupt...while on the other hand HPET will deliver interrupt. > 3, I compiled it in ia32 and run it with ia32-libs in amd64, it passed. Very confusing to me. Again I can only guess that maybe in your AMD64 machine, HPET is default timer? -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies