Re: academia contribution to the kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:30:15PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:44:25PM +1200, Ronnie Collinson wrote:
> >> Quite generic, but over the last N months or year what feature or some form of
> >> milestone has excited and/or pleased you the most, excluding 2.3 numbering.
> >> Could be intersting.
> >
> > Ah, yes, you were not the first one to think of this one, it's on my
> > list already :)
> >
> 
> I have another question. Maybe a silly one but here it goes:

Not silly at all.

> As far as I know linux staging is not only a mean to add code that
> still is not in a mergeable form but also to deprecate old code. This
> also applies to old subsystem like IBM MCA and ISA? Are these old
> buses and ancient architectures being deprecated in the next 3.x
> releases?

Nice point, I'll try to work it in.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux