Re: unlocked_ioctl explanation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ezequiel,

2011/5/17 Ezequiel García <elezegarcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I am aware that ioctl has been superseeded by unlocked_ioctl. I've been looking through patches and this seems to be BKL related.
>
> Could someone explain further the differences and reasons for the new ioctl prototype and name?
>
> I guess 'unlocked' means BKL is no longer held inside ioctl, right?

Exaclty.

> What precautions should we take when using unlocked_ioctl ?

Well, since there is no BKL, your ioctl can get preempted by another
process and that other process just might happen to make an ioctl call
to your driver.

So your driver has to protect itself from being called by 2 threads
simultaneously, if that's a problem.

Some drivers won't need any extra protection. Unfortunately, it really
depends on exactly what your driver code does.

--
Dave Hylands
Shuswap, BC, Canada
http://www.davehylands.com

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux