Re: is the tickless kernel now the "standard"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:41:30PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   given that ubuntu ships with the kernel configured for tickless
> behaviour, and that RHEL6 also ships tickless, is it safe to say that
> tickless is now the standard configuration?  is there a compelling
> reason to *not* run tickless with the latest 2.6 kernels?

Yes it is the "standard" and no, there is not any reason to not enable
it.  Unless you like burning extra power for no reason.

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux