Re: Avoid mandatory locks? Really? According to linux/Documentation/filesystems/mandatory-locking.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 22:08, Kevin O'Gorman <kogorman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That may be an overstatement.  Most of the complaints are about DoS attacks
> and/or
> distributed systems.  That's pretty awful, and means the locking is not
> scaleable, but

alright...maybe that's why, e.g in distributed fs such as GFS, we need
(gfs) lockd or something like that...ok, now I could guess, that's due
to some of POSIX lock weaknesses.. CMIIW
-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux