On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:11 PM, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Did you try giving a common signal handler for two different signals ?
> Hi folks,
> AFAIK there is not particular system call in Linux systems that can
> register a number of signals (signal numbers) at once and provide a common
> signal handler for all of the assembled signals.
Yes i did.
Why not....for example... I want to print "quitting...." error msg if
> I know doing this may be
> hardly required in practice.
I get SIGINT or SIGQUIT.
Ok. i think these messages are for debugging purpose. But anyway let it be common. :)
> _______________________________________________
> But i think this type of system call should be
> in Linux systems which can serve handler functionality on some of signals.
> Please tell me the flaws proposing something like this. i want to work on
> this tiny problem. :)
> --
> ........................
> MOHIT VERMA
>
>
>
> --
> ........................
> MOHIT VERMA
>
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>
>
--
Thanks -
Manish
--
........................
MOHIT VERMA
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies