On 10 February 2011 06:12, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: MDaemon at fibcom.com <MDaemon@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM > Subject: Permanent Delivery Failure > To: mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx > > > The attached message had PERMANENT fatal delivery errors! I had this bounce before, and emailed the kernelnewbies-owner, but I dont think I had a response yet. Not sure if anyone is working on this problem... Regards, Srdjan > After one or more unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has > been removed from the mail queue on this server. ÂThe number and frequency > of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration parameters. > > YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED TO ANY OF IT'S RECIPIENTS! > > --- Session Transcript --- > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Parsing message > <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\pd50001467261.msg> > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂFrom: mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂTo: amit@xxxxxxxxxx > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂSubject: module prob > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂMessage-ID: > <AANLkTi=TTnOfZubXZARJByf8n82r4pXp1shg1j-JsfZR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂRoute slip host: 202.71.129.104 > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂRoute slip port: 25 > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104] > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting to send message to smart host > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Attempting SMTP connection to [202.71.129.104:25] > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for socket connection... > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: * ÂConnection established (192.5.1.2:2559 -> > 202.71.129.104:25) > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: Waiting for protocol to start... > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 220 smtp ready smtp.bizmail.net4india.com > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> EHLO fibcom.com > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-smtp.bizmail.net4india.com Hello > fibcom.com [203.101.81.201] > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-SIZE 57671680 > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250-PIPELINING > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 HELP > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> MAIL From:<mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> SIZE=15160 > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 250 OK > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: --> RCPT To:<amit@xxxxxxxxxx> > ÂThu 2011-02-10 11:31:36: <-- 550 relay not permitted > --- End Transcript --- (snip) > Thank you. > > Fibcom India Limited > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From:Âmohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> > To:Âkernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernelnewbies > <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date:ÂThu, 10 Feb 2011 11:31:32 +0530 > Subject:Âmodule prob > hi all, > i have written a tiny module . when i install this one i check in dmesg and > /proc/kallsyms. > these files shows that the module is currently running . but when i go for > "ohm_inode_permission" kernel security function in /proc/kallsyms it does > not show that security operation but > that must be registered along with the registration of module. > i 've attached the source code along with........ > > i think the problem is while registering the security function > ohm_inode_permission (IMHO). but.................. > can someone tell me where am i wrong? _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
