On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Shreyansh Jain <shrey.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Javier, >> I will try to keep the code always in sync with linux-next but there >> will be tags to stable versions. Now there are tags that compile with >> kernel versions 2.6.32, 2.6.35 and 2.6.37. > > Do you need help in making the ldd3 files compliant for any other > kernels? Do you have any plans for others kernels (besides the > linux-next) in your mind which might need porting work - probably some > people on the list (including me) might be interested. Note that 2.6.32 has been designated a LTS (Long Term Support) kernel by the powers that be. So that kernel would be good one to focus training resources on. It will likely be supported for several years by Redhat, Suse, Canonical, etc. Thus testing all the LDD3 examples with it would be very beneficial. ie. It is the basis of SLES 11.1 SP1, etc. so these firms are contractually obligated to support a LTS kernel for years. To lighten the load, they got together and chose the 2.6.32 kernel as one they would support together. I think this is the first time they have tried this approach. I suspect they will do it again a couple years from now. Greg _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
