---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:10 PM
Subject: nameidata data structure again
To: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
hi folks,
we have qstr data structure part in nameidata structure in name resolution.
so it may work like this :
nameidata->path->dentry->qstr.
it is the real name component in a path name for that directory ro file (i think so).
so what is the need of having another qstr like:
namidata->qstr (ie. last)
in nameidata structure.
sorry ,it may seem foolish to u guys but i ............
thanks in advance.
--
........................
From: mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:10 PM
Subject: nameidata data structure again
To: kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
hi folks,
we have qstr data structure part in nameidata structure in name resolution.
so it may work like this :
nameidata->path->dentry->qstr.
it is the real name component in a path name for that directory ro file (i think so).
so what is the need of having another qstr like:
namidata->qstr (ie. last)
in nameidata structure.
sorry ,it may seem foolish to u guys but i ............
thanks in advance.
--
........................
MOHIT VERMA
--
........................
MOHIT VERMA
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies