On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 00:40, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Your question isn't specific enough, so I'll just guess. Let's say
>
> hi all,
> i have seen many places in kernel where the variables specially the
> structures should be of fixed size independent of the architecture. i went
> through the definitions of them but dint get clearly (or frankly say
> ...dint get them even a bit) .
"int". In 32 bit, AFAIK it's 4 byte, but in 64 bit (like IA 64, not
sure if it's x64) it's 8 byte. So, if you just say "int", you will
likely getting screwed up.
By using types like u_int or something like that, you pretty much say
"I mean 4 byte kind of integer" etc
Still there can be padding issues due to byte alignment, which may vary across architecture. Am not sure if that is controllable (probably some pragma to gcc?). Probably, OP is asking about it?
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
--
Rajesh S R
http://rajeshsr.co.cc/blogs/
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
