Hi all...
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 17:03, Robert P. J. Day <
rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> perhaps mulyadi had the right idea -- that gcc is simply optimizing
> that symbol away. add some code to that first module that does
> something with that symbol, perhaps prints it, just to make sure gcc
> doesn't throw it away.
Other (untested and unrealiable) idea is to use "volatile"
identifier...AFAIK, that would prevent symbols to be optimized out.
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email
with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to
ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxPlease read the FAQ at
http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ