Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
From: Rajat Sharma <fs.rajat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:01:43 +0530
Cc: kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikSXJYi2em0AMGbsx-0PHvwo9H=SxWYDo2BFnsR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Mulyadi,

Thanks for the reply.

> I second that.... if not, the function name wouldn't be labeled "user"...

I agree its perfect to have API name reflect what it is doing, but is there any work around deal with this function limitation?

Rajat

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa

References:
- How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
  - From: Rajat Sharma
- Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
  - From: Mulyadi Santosa

Prev by Date: Re: /proc/meminfo - Diagram
Next by Date: Re: /proc/meminfo - Diagram
Previous by thread: Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
Next by thread: Re: How to do DIRECT IO on kernel buffer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Newbies FAQ] [Linux Kernel Mentors] [Linux Kernel Development] [IETF Annouce] [Git] [Networking] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ACPI]

Powered by Linux