Re: a basic ques regarding scheduling -- curiosity sake...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 16:25, Carlo Caione <carlo.caione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I could be wrong (I'm guessing) but I think that a sort of buffering should be done in
> the hardware of the sound card so you can hear the sound even
> if the process is not providing data.

I second that....

AFAIK, the data are buffered to sound card up to certain size by the
first player that plays song A....assume data from song B are queued
next....thus, in this case, A sings...then B...or it could be heard
mixed i.e we hear A + B.

But if it's like playing song to PC speaker directly, then yes,
timeslice do determine the playing interval.

PS: PulseAudio etc could turn the table upside down...it's the sound
daemon that take care of it...

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux