SO......................??
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 22:16, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:What conflict? syscall is syscall, trap is a trap
> hi guys,
> i have read in a paper that divide-by-zero trap handler is not implemented
> via system calls ( on old solaris systems).
> but if we talk about the interrupt vectors ,as i know that divede-by-zero is
> vectored at first in idt.
> so why this conflict ?
--
regards,
Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant
blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com