Thanks Peter... I had this question because one of the project I am working on had a two different flavour of UFS.. one is UFS and other one is UFS64 bit, ported on proprietary OS.
-Manish
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
thanks for the confirmation.....the only thing that matters is
performance. as the data structure for the VFS layer is independent
(generally, i think) of 64 or 32bit kernel, so it should be indep of
64/32bit kernel, but because 64bit have a larger data I/O rate, so
performance should be higher....at the expense of more memory
consumed......
--
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM, SandeepKsinha<sandeepksinha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Manish,
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> i don't think there is such a thing as 32/64 bit filesystem.
>> Filesystem type does not need to be linked to the OS's 32/64 bit
>> architecture. Ie, ext2 or ext3, is the same when mounted in either
>> filesystem. but the content within filesystem does matter, eg, if it
>> is 32/64bit executable etc.
>
> This is true !!!!
>
>
> Regards,
> Sandeep.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> “To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner.”
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:37 AM, manish<rangankarmanish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I have basic query!!
>> >
>> > I can have 32 and 64 bit filesystem on 64-bit kernel. Is it possible to
>> > have 64-bit filesystem on 32 bit kernel? Does linux support it?
>> >
>> > -Manish R
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Peter Teoh
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
>> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
>>
>
>
Regards,
Peter Teoh