Re: Kernel OOPS analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You could run a 'ksymoops' against the trace that that most of the
time gives you the point of crash.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, amit mehta <amit4g@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting following OOPS on one of my Linux box.
> Its related with one of a loadable module. To proceed further from here, I
> need generic
> suggestion/pointers for debugging kernel OOPS.
>
>  <snip>
>  [<c0104878>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30
>  [<f8e2d06f>] scst_cmd_thread+0x9c/0xfc [scst]
>  [<c011bbed>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x8
>  [<f8e2cfd3>] scst_cmd_thread+0x0/0xfc [scst]
>  [<c012f5fa>] kthread+0x38/0x5d
>  [<c012f5c2>] kthread+0x0/0x5d
>  [<c0104a37>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>  =======================
>  <snip>
>
>
> Apparently 'schedule' is throwing this message:
>
> if (unlikely(in_atomic() && !current->exit_state)) {
>       printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while atomic: "
>          "%s/0x%08x/%d\n",
>          current->comm, preempt_count(), current->pid);
>       debug_show_held_locks(current)
> ;
>       if (irqs_disabled())
>          print_irqtrace_events(current);
>       dump_stack();
>    }
> __amit
>
> --
> "Everyone has a photographic memory. Some people just don't have film."
>
> — Mel Brooks
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux