Has the system timer paradigm changed between 2.6.18 and 2.6.29? I'm trying to update my Broadcom-based embedded system to 2.6.29, and I'm running into problems getting the system timer to run. I'm looking for a clue about how to port forward my arch/mips/brcmstb/* files, specifically I want to write a plat_time_init() function that does for 2.6.29 what plat_timer_setup(struct irqaction *irq) did for 2.6.18. In 2.6.18, arch/mips/kernel/time.c defines a high-level ISR called timer_interrupt (which does things like lock xtime_lock, call mips_hpt_read() and do_timer(regs), and return IRQ_HANDLED). time.c then defines a struct irqaction timer_irqaction and sets timer_interrupt to be the .handler field. Finally, time.c calls plat_timer_setup(timer_irqaction), which is defined by the Broadcom patches to call setup_irq(timer_irqaction). In 2.6.29, arch/mips/kernel/time.c has a comment saying that the new plat_time_init hook does not receive the irqaction pointer argument anymore, because each "clock_event_device" should use its own struct irqrequest. I tried having the broadcom arch's plat_time_init() function create an irqaction and call setup_irq(), but the timer_interrupt() function that used to be in arch/mips/kernel/time.c doesn't exist anymore, and I can't seem to find the replacement. Is there a replacement for timer_interrupt()? I thought that maybe the hrtimer_interrupt() might be the one, but it requires something called a struct clock_event_device. Am I barking up the wrong tree here? Thanks, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
