Re: Choosing Driver Model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In kernel source's Documentation/driver-model there are a few other
documented structures for Linux Kernel drivers:

device.txt  platform.txt   devres.txt    binding.txt
bus.txt  class.txt  driver.txt  interface.txt  overview.txt  porting.txt

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:51 AM, xin yuepeng <yuepeng.xin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>      I met this situation as you. I chose the platform_driver... It seems
> ok.
>
> Lucky
>
> 2009/3/31 Ole Loots <ole@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I'm writing a Driver that uses an not-so-well-known Bus System. I'm
>> developing for the at91 Processor, the processor has an "Extension Bus
>> Interface" ... it's good enough to make CF Cards, IDE disks, etc. work.
>>
>> I'm developing a driver for an Hardware device that is connected to the
>> Bus. ( the device is some kind of higher-voltage IO Pin collection... 15 -
>> 45 V)
>>
>> My questions is: Should I work with structure:  platform_driver or is
>> there some kind of different structure that fit's better?
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
>> "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
>>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Peter Teoh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux