>> > Hello All, >> > >> > Is it possible to take semaphore in one thread and release it >> > in >> > another thread? Yes, because AFAIK a semaphore do not have a concept of owner. [...] > > Actually I was reading about synchronization mechanism in Linux ans > Windows. So same case is applicable to mutex as well. I mean it possible to > take mutex one thread and release it in another thread. But in Windows there > is mutex ownership concept, meaning thread which takes mutex has to release > it. So if some thread release mutex, which is held by another thread then > there wont be mutual exclusive access to shared data protected by mutex in > that thread. Mutex itself implies an ownership. A sempahore which has ownership awareness is very close to mutex. May I suggest using Mutex instead of semaphore, unless absolutely necessary. Advantages - Easy to debug, once who takes the lock releases it etc etc. CMIIW. Thanks, --Pradeep > > > Sorry for silly question :). > > > Thanks > Shyam > > > > Thanks > Shyam > -- Pradeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
