Re: platform device , uevent file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:43:51PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 07:47:05PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't really understand how kernel generates events when working
>>> >> with platform devices and drivers ( [1] ).
>>> >> I have registered my driver with platform_driver_register and my
>>> >> device with platform_device_register_simple.
>>> >>
>>> >> I want to dynamically create the node in /dev , and for that i need
>>> >> the kernel to send events like ( MAJOR=x, MINOR=y)
>>> >> that will be interpreted by the udev daemon acording to rules from
>>> >> /etc/udev/rules.d.
>>> >
>>> > Platform devices can't do this, you need to use a "real" struct device,
>>> > or register with a class that handles major/minor allocation for you
>>> > (input, block, etc.)
>>> >
>>> > hope this helps,
>>> >
>>> > greg k-h
>>> >
>>>
>>> thanks for your answer.
>>>
>>> I'm writing a driver for a character device [hex display] .
>>>
>>> Registering with an existing class its pretty hard since it doesn't
>>> fit well in none of the existing classes.
>>
>> There are other drivers in the kernel that already do something like
>> this, are you sure there isn't an existing class for you already?
>>
>
> I'm still searching for it. Any suggestion , it's welcomed.
>
>>> One good option would be misc class but this enforces the usage of major 10.
>>
>> What's wrong with that?  It's a dynamic minor number that will "just
>> work" for your device.
>>
> Yes , you are right here it's "just working". But I have some requirements
> that ask for major to be dynamically allocated.
>
>>> So , the only solution remaining is using a "real" struct device. I'm
>>> already using a struct cdev , and it is not very clear for me the
>>> link between struct cdev and struct device.
>>
>> There is no link whatsoever.  Yeah, it's confusing at times, sorry, the
>> cdev interface needs a major overhaul...
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> thanks,
> Daniel.
>
PS: I accidentally clicked Reply instead of Reply to All .

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux