RE: Pre-emption and kernel/softlockup.c softlockup_tick()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hm,from the function's comment:
> 
> /*
>  *This callback runs from the timer interrupt, and checks
> * whether the watchdog thread has hung or not:
>  */
> 
> that means,it runs in interrupt context, thus AFAIK it won't 
> be preempted.
Thanks Mulyadi.

If I wanted to trace back through the code that got to softlock_tick(),
ehat would I look for to find out if pre-emtive switching had been
disabled in the kernel source that I have


Adrian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux