Re: ioctl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Alexander Potashev wrote:

> Hello, Robert!
>
> On 10:12 Sat 03 Jan     , Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   the last i heard, while ioctl's aren't going away any time soon,
> > they're deprecated in favour of ... uh, files under /sys?  am i
>
> How is it possible to replace ioctls by files in /sys? Should my kernel
> module create a file in /sys and communicate with applications through
> read/write syscalls?

  that would be the standard way.  ioctl()s are just one of a number
of user<->kernel space communication mechanisms and, IIRC, ioctls are
now deprecated since they have no real structure to them.  having your
kernel code create and manipulate files under /sys is *allegedly* a
more structured way of doing things, but i'm willing to be corrected
if someone knows any better.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux