Re: Should /proc/kallsyms contain the sys_call_table symbol?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not sure if I understand you correct, but on my stock Fedora 9 host:

[~]$ cat /proc/kallsyms | grep sys_call_table
c0676a30 R sys_call_table

It is there as well ... did I misread your original post?

ruby

Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Giannis Kozyrakis <trv@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just for informing anyone interested, and for completeness sake, I must
say that I finally found out what was causing this weird behavior in Ubuntu.


Ubuntu is (as far as I tested) the only major distribution that ships
its kernels with the option KALLSYMS_ALL enabled in the kernel's config
file.

This is what is causing the sys_call_table symbol (and many more too),
to appear in the /proc/kallsyms file.

I've contacted the Ubuntu folks asking for a reasoning for this.

Thanks for letting us know. I guess they want to locate certain
symbols but they don't want to alter any kernel source code (e.g feed
it into EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() )

regards,

Mulyadi.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux