Re: Can /proc/stat be trusted?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Are you running a tick-less kernel? That may explain the variations.

Elad

I don't think I can really help you here, but I might as well note that
I also had problems with /proc/stat. I have my questions regarding its
accuracy:

http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/2008-07/msg00196.html

I should mention that when I increased the sleeping time my errors got
relatively smaller. That is, if with 1 second of sleep I got values
ranging from 99 to 500, with 10 seconds of sleep I got values ranging
from 1000 to 1500.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux