Re: Polling in kernel threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Lukas Razik <linux@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello Johannes!
>
>> You don't give the scheduler a chance to run.  If you sleep, the
>> scheduler will run and be able to deliver the signal and this is why it
>> works then.
>>
>> Spinning like this is bad.  That should actually freeze a UP machine if
>> I do not miss something.
>
> The driver is _only_ for systems with many CPUs otherwise polling
> wouldn't be a good idea at all...
> O.K. the scheduler can't deliver the signal - that's reasonable. But
> why can one kernel thread make a system unstable even if there are
> several CPUs?
>
> Could the system instability appear (for example), because the
> "events" thread which runs on the same CPU like my kernel thread,
> doesn't process the works which are in its work queue? Or are all
> works of the "default" queue delivered to other "events" threads on
> the free CPUs?

I am just guessing now, but if there are shared resources locked by
processes running on the CPU your driver hogged completely, it stalls
all other processes waiting for them.

And I figure there are other things but this one kernel thread running
on that CPU, too?

	Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux