Hi, Lukas Razik <linux@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hello Johannes! > >> You don't give the scheduler a chance to run. If you sleep, the >> scheduler will run and be able to deliver the signal and this is why it >> works then. >> >> Spinning like this is bad. That should actually freeze a UP machine if >> I do not miss something. > > The driver is _only_ for systems with many CPUs otherwise polling > wouldn't be a good idea at all... > O.K. the scheduler can't deliver the signal - that's reasonable. But > why can one kernel thread make a system unstable even if there are > several CPUs? > > Could the system instability appear (for example), because the > "events" thread which runs on the same CPU like my kernel thread, > doesn't process the works which are in its work queue? Or are all > works of the "default" queue delivered to other "events" threads on > the free CPUs? I am just guessing now, but if there are shared resources locked by processes running on the CPU your driver hogged completely, it stalls all other processes waiting for them. And I figure there are other things but this one kernel thread running on that CPU, too? Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ