Re: atomic operation in 32 bit but no in 64!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  There are so many dereferencing, that while traversing the tree of
>  pointers, some may get changed, by other threads.   Problem is that
>  many times in the kernel, spinlocks are not implemented, so as to
>  prevent deadlock, and racy situation allowed as a compromise.   The

For a good example of a racy situation allowed as a compromise via the
use of atomic_xxxx APIs:

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/873684

-- 
Regards,
Peter Teoh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux