Re: Bad Erase block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:21 PM, tomy <tomy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>   During  Linux booting, some bad erase block printf is coming as following.
>  Scanning device for bad blocks
>  Bad eraseblock 0 at 0x00000000
>  Bad eraseblock 1 at 0x00020000
>  Bad eraseblock 2 at 0x00040000
>  Bad eraseblock 3 at 0x00060000
>  Bad eraseblock 8 at 0x00100000
>  Bad eraseblock 9 at 0x00120000
>  .....
>  What will be reason behind this ?.
>
>  --
>  Thanks & Regards
>
>  Tomy Devasia
>  Product Devpt & Support
>  Kalki Communication Technologies Ltd
>  Bangalore
>  India
>
>

Found here:

./drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_bbt.c:
                                printk(KERN_WARNING "Bad eraseblock %d
at 0x%08x\n",

./drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c:
                        printk(KERN_WARNING "Bad eraseblock %d at 0x%08x\n",

May be Thomas will have better insights.   What happened is that the
NAND devices may have a BBT (bad block table) setup within by the
manufacturer.   And Linux kernel is reading it, but as indicated, it
is just a warning, as anything in the BBT "should" not be read by the
kernel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux