Re: Not using the dynamic parameter kstack_depth_to_print?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13-02-08 02:23, Peter Teoh wrote:

see the variable even if CONFIG_X86 is taken away.   Anyway, in summary,
for x86 and some architecture, kstack_depth can be controlled via sysfs,
but for others it is hardcoded.  not sure why, hardware depedent?

Not too much it seems. Not sure why this has been pushed as an x86 thing; it seems it could've been made configurable for all arches.

<shrug>.

I actually believe it's rather silly to make it configurable in the first place. Maybe after kgdb is in, that would be a good time to do away with that sysctl again.

Rene.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux