Re: Basic question about IOCTL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 8, 2008 2:28 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
see?  total freedom in terms of how you interpret the values, which is
why ioctl() calls are actually deprecated these days -- they're just
too unstructured, and are being phased out in terms of /proc or sysfs
entries.  but there's obviously a lot of them still in the kernel.

They are being phased out? You mean they may not be supported in future kernel versions?
And is the alternative to ioctl()s, reading/writing to special /proc or /sysfs entries? Is that faster/slower than ioctl()s, or just cleaner.

Thanks for all your replies.
-Mayank

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux