Re: alternatives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Le Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:31:13 +0000,
ninjaboy <n0b0dyn1nj4@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Yes, that makes sense, but why on AMD64 X2 is better rep insn than
> unrolled? In my userspace test case rep is slower than unrolled.

My knowledge of microprocessor internals is unfortunately too limited to
give a precise answer to your question.

However, you can see the code that sets X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD at
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c#574.
The above comment says

 « On C+ stepping K8 rep microcode works well for copy/memset »

You can read section 3.7.6 of the « Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures
Optimization Reference Manual » for more informations about using "rep"
for optimization. This manual is available at
http://www.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/index.htm.

Sincerly,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni - thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxx
http://{thomas,sos,kos}.enix.org - http://www.toulibre.org
http://www.{livret,agenda}dulibre.org

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux