Hi, Le Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:41:46 -0400 (EDT), "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > so ELEMCOUNT() is clearly just an alternative to the more common > ARRAY_SIZE() macro. but calling the macro SCTP_CHUNKMAP_IS_CLEAR() > pretty clearly assumes that you can determine the array size of the > macro parameter "chunkmap". however, from the source file > net/netfilter/xt_sctp.c, we have: Yup, looks strange. > i don't see how you can reasonably call the macro > SCTP_CHUNKMAP_IS_CLEAR() with a *pointer* to an array and expect that > macro to be able to determine the "size" of that array. AFAIK, > wouldn't you just get the answer "1" as the alleged size? Could be 0 too, if the size of an element of the array is bigger than the size of an integer. Sincerly, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni - thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxx http://{thomas,sos,kos}.enix.org - http://www.toulibre.org http://www.{livret,agenda}dulibre.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
