Re: is "kernel function trace" facility even viable anymore?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 06:05 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i was in the midst of documenting the various kernel debugging
> options, and ran across a description of the above:  KFT.  is this
> even maintained anymore?  the most recent reference to it appears to
> be in the context of 2.6.12:
> 
> http://tree.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/KernelFunctionTrace
> is anyone still using this?

I have done this for 2.6.17 as well, had to change a few things and port
it to my platform.

Other than that, its a good feature to calculate exact kernel boot time.
Not so sure about the dynamic KFT, since it also adds huge overhead into
the running kernel.

- Sandeep


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux